Whenever out and
about taking photos, I’ve always used my 18-200 lens because of its
versatility. Having read yesterday that Henry Cartier-Bresson often stuck to
one 50mm lens, I thought I’d give it a try. I’ve had a 50mm lens for a while
now and due to its 1.8 aperture, I’ve mainly used it for a narrow depth of field
or low light situations.
Bresson’s take on
the subject appears to be that by using the one focal length, you can develop a
better idea of how your photographs will look as you see a scene. The 50mm
focal length also has the benefit of producing images almost as the eye sees. A
family trip to the beach seemed like a perfect opportunity to try this out as
there was plenty of space to move around while getting used to not having a
zoom.
After a bit of
running back and forth to get the right shots, I quickly found myself
developing an instinctive feel for the distance needed between myself and the
subject.
I started to think about the benefits of using this lens more often:
I started to think about the benefits of using this lens more often:
·
Develop
an instinctive knowledge of the focal length
·
A
nice wide aperture to help with low light and narrow depth of field
·
Much
lighter to lug about than larger lenses
There are
drawbacks:
·
There
will be times I just can’t fit everything I want in shot
·
No
zoom means if I can’t get close, I can’t get the shot
Larger versions of these images can be seen on Flickr: Hornsea
I plan to spend the next couple of months, just using my 50mm lens for days out, developing my street photography skills.
I plan to spend the next couple of months, just using my 50mm lens for days out, developing my street photography skills.
Watch this
space...
No comments:
Post a Comment